Here are 8 Accounting Policies and Changes is a comprehensive guide to IAS.

IAS 8 regulates the reasons for evaluating and changing accounting policies, as well as the financial statement and representation of changes in accounting policies, adjustments in accounting estimates, and any rectification of prior period mistakes.


What is the objective of IAS 8?


The goal of the Standard is to increase the financial statements' validity and reliability, as well as their consistency across time and with the income statement of other organisations.


As per IAS 12 on Income Taxes, the tax implications of correcting preceding correcting errors retrospective adjustments to reflect the impact of accounting practises should be recognized for, reported, and disclosed.


An entity must apply this Standard for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2005.


Essential definitions


Accounting rules are a company's specific concepts, foundations, customs, rules, and methods for preparing and showing financial statements.


A modification in a valuation allowance means a change in the realisable amounts of an entity's asset or liability as a consequence of a reevaluation of the present status of projected future advantages and obligations associated with the asset or liability.


Any form of exclusions or misstatements identified in the financial statements of a company concerned in connection to one or more previous periods is known as prior period mistakes. These deficiencies or misstatements are the outcomes of a failure to use credible data or the misapplication of accurate information that was available at the time the financial statements for that period were prepared and released and could have been reasonably supposed to be taken into account in the planning and implementation of such financial statements[1].


Significant exclusions or misstatements were facts that could have a major effect on the financial decisions that participants made based on the financial statements, either separately or jointly.


The substance of a misstatement is established by the scope and nature of the alleged violation in the context of the business. Disclosure may be determined by the item's scale, character, or a combination of both.


A new accounting strategy is designed to events, other business concerns, and circumstances as if it had always been implemented in disciplinary sanctions.


Utilisation and choosing


When an IFRS refers to a transaction, occurrence, or circumstance in a specific way, the accounting policy is defined by applying that specific IFRS, according to IAS 8. To put it another way, when an IFRS directly relates to a transaction, related occurrences, or scenario, the accounting policy or policies applicable to that issue should be decided by applying the relevant IFRS and considering any IASB Implementation Guidance.


When there is no clear standard or interpretation that applies to a transaction, other events, or circumstance, the company's management must use its judgement in creating accounting rules that produce accurate and useful data. The following sources, given in order of importance, will be used by the company's management to determine the significance of their judgement:


  • the standards, criteria, and guidelines of the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) that apply to similar and relevant circumstances; and

  • the Framework's classifications, performance criteria, and measuring instruments for assets, liabilities, profits, and expenses


Consistent accounting principles


According to IAS 8, a corporation must select and apply its accounting policies uniformly for identical transactions, other events, and scenarios unless an IFRS requires or enables the classification of items for which different rules may be used. If an IFRS requires or permits such classification, an appropriate accounting policy should be selected and implemented uniformly to each group.


Policy alterations


Once an IFRS requires it or when the change will cause the company's financial statements to resemble more consistent and precise information about the effects of transactions, other incidences, or circumstances on the company's financial position, financial results, and cash flows, may a corporation modify its accounting policy.


A shift in accounting policy following the adoption of an IFRS must be expected to comply with the IFRS's specific transitional rules if any exist. The modification must be applied retroactively if a company updates an accounting policy during the initial version of an IFRS that does not include specific transitional measures for that changes, or if the company adjusts an accounting policy willingly.


A modification in accounting policy, on the other side, should be applied retrospectively unless it is difficult to determine the time frame or accumulated effects of the change, according to IAS 8.


The following are the declarations for changes in accounting policies triggered by a new norm:


  • the name of the rule or judgment that has resulted in the modification

  • a shift in the basis of accounting standard

  • a synopsis of the transitory rules, including those which may influence future periods

  • The sum of the modification applied for every financial statement line category that is impacted, as well as basic and diluted EPS (only when the firm follows IAS 33), for the current period and every prior period presented, to the potential it is practical.

  • If a retroactive correction is not possible, a justification and detail of how the alteration was implemented in accounting policies should be provided.


The following are the disclosures related to the voluntary modifications in accounting policies:


  • a shift like accounting policy

  • the reasons why the new accounting standard provides more accurate and relevant data

  • The amount of the modification applied for every financial statement line category that is affected, as well as basic and diluted EPS (only when the firm follows IAS 33), for the current period and every previous period presented, to the extent it is practical.

  • If a retroactive adjustment is not possible, a justification and explanation of how the change was implemented in accounting policies should be provided.


Changes in projections


The use of rough approximations is an integral part of preparing financial statements and does not risk their correctness. Accounting estimates that change as a result of new knowledge or events are not considered fixes of errors.


As per IAS 8, the impact of changes in an accounting estimate must be reported effectively and reflected in profit or loss for the period in issue, i.e., the period in question.


  • the period during which the transition happens, and the change only affects that period, or

  • When a change impacts both, the period of the change, as well as the expected output, must be taken into account.


The following are the disclosures for revisions in estimates:


  • the nature and extent of a modification in an accounting estimate that has an impact on the current period or is expected to have any implications for future periods.

  • If the magnitude of the impact of such an affect on future periods cannot be predicted, the business is required to report such data.


Errors from previous periods


Arithmetical mistakes, flaws in the company's application of accounting rules, deficiencies or misreadings of events in the books, and fraud are all examples of accruals errors.


A business concern must repair serious prior period mistakes prospectively during the first set of financial statements authorized for issue following their identification unless it is impossible to determine either the time frame or accumulated impact of the prior period error or mistake.


The mistakes must be addressed by reiterating similar numbers for the previous period or periods in which the problem happened. If the error or omission occurred before the most current prior period reported, it must be remedied by reiterating the asset, liability, and equity starting balances for the most current previous years shown.


The following are the disclosures for the preceding period errors:


  • the cause of the preceding period's error

  • To the extent possible, the amount of the adjustment applied for each affected financial statement line category, as well as basic and diluted EPS (only where the firm follows IAS 33), for each prior quarter provided.

  • the quantity of rectification carried out at the commencement of the most current previous period

  • If prospective rectification is not possible, a justification and explanation of how the error was corrected would suffice.


Conclusion


When selecting and executing accounting policies, as well as accounting for any changes in accounting policies, changes in accounting estimates and corrections of prior-period errors, this Indian Accounting Standard (IAS 8) must be implemented.


Comments